AI가 그린 그림이 미술대회 1등해서 난리난 미술계 근황 / 스브스뉴스

스브스뉴스 SUBUSUNEWS
8 Sept 202207:01

TLDRA recent art competition in Colorado, USA, sparked controversy when a piece created by artificial intelligence (AI) won the grand prize. The artist, Jason Allen, used an AI called Midjourney to generate over 900 images, then curated and refined them to select three for submission. Despite backlash from the art community questioning the authenticity of AI-generated art, the competition organizers did not revoke the award due to the lack of guidelines on AI submissions. The debate over whether AI creations should be considered as works of art and who should hold the copyright is ongoing. In Korea, similar issues have arisen with AI-generated poetry and music, highlighting the need for a legal framework to address the intellectual property rights of AI creations. The National Intellectual Property Committee in Korea is actively discussing these matters, with recommendations to attribute copyright to those who contribute to AI creation and to revise the law to accommodate the use of big data in AI. As AI technology advances and its creations become more sophisticated, the art world and legal systems will need to adapt to these new challenges.

Takeaways

  • 🎨 An AI-generated artwork won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, causing controversy in the art world.
  • 🤔 The competition did not rescind the award due to the lack of guidelines regarding AI-created submissions.
  • 🏆 Jason Allen, the winner, used an AI tool called 'Midjourney' to create over 900 images and selected 3 for submission.
  • 📈 Allen utilized an AI called 'Gigapixel' to enhance the image quality, and he received a $300 prize for his effort.
  • 😠 Many artists expressed anger and questioned the legitimacy of AI participation in creative competitions.
  • 🧐 The debate centers on whether AI can be considered an author and if the person using AI should be credited for the creation.
  • 🤖 AI, like Midjourney, can produce numerous images quickly, blurring the line between human and machine authorship.
  • 📚 AI has access to vast amounts of learning data, enabling it to create sophisticated and stylistically diverse images.
  • 💡 Allen's role in the process was to curate and refine the AI's output, suggesting a collaborative approach to creation.
  • 🇰🇷 In Korea, AI creations are becoming more prevalent, but current copyright law only recognizes human-made works.
  • 📉 The lack of clarity on copyright for AI creations affects both producers and consumers, with implications for the future of creative work.
  • 🛠️ The National Intellectual Property Committee in Korea is discussing the need for a legal framework to address AI-generated content.

Q & A

  • What was the controversy in the art competition in Colorado, USA?

    -The controversy was that an individual named Jason Allen won the grand prize for a painting created by an artificial intelligence (AI). This sparked debate as there were no direct guidelines against using AI for creating art in the competition.

  • How did Jason Allen use AI to create his winning artwork?

    -Allen used a drawing AI called Midjourney to create more than 900 images. He then selected three of his favorite works, refined them using an AI called 'Gigapixel', and submitted them to the competition.

  • What was the public reaction to AI winning an art competition?

    -Many artists were angry and questioned the legitimacy of AI-created art. They argued that it was not fair for AI to participate in a competition that traditionally celebrates human creativity.

  • How does the AI, Midjourney, work?

    -Midjourney is an AI that can create images based on textual prompts. Users can type commands into a chat window to generate images, and then use various functions to refine and select the best images.

  • What are the implications of AI in the field of art and intellectual property?

    -The rise of AI in creative fields raises questions about the definition of authorship and the applicability of current copyright laws. It challenges the notion of what constitutes a 'work' and who should hold the rights to AI-generated content.

  • Why did Kakao Brain face difficulties in registering a copyright for a collection of AI-written poems?

    -Kakao Brain faced difficulties because current copyright law only recognizes works made by humans. Since the poems were written by an AI named Sia, they could not be registered under the existing legal framework.

  • What is the National Intellectual Property Committee doing to address the issue of AI and copyright?

    -The National Intellectual Property Committee has established a special AI-Intellectual Property Committee to discuss and prepare for the future when AI creations become more prevalent. They are considering revisions to the copyright law to accommodate AI-generated works.

  • What are the challenges in granting copyright to AI creations?

    -There are several challenges, including determining who should hold the copyright (the AI developers, the users, or the AI itself), the extent to which rights should be protected, and how to differentiate between sophisticated AI creations and those of human creators.

  • What is the current stance of the National Intellectual Property Committee regarding AI and copyright?

    -The committee recommends that humans or corporations contributing to the creation of AI should be attributed copyright. They also suggest that the copyright law should be revised to exempt those who have contributed to AI from using works when utilizing big data.

  • How do current copyright laws affect the producers and consumers of AI creations?

    -Producers of AI creations may be hesitant to invest in technology due to the lack of copyright protection and potential profits. On the other hand, consumers may face the prospect of having to pay for AI creations that they previously used for free if copyrights are recognized.

  • What is the future outlook for AI in the creative industries?

    -As AI technology advances, it is expected that more sophisticated creations will be mass-produced. This could lead to a reevaluation of copyright laws and the potential exclusion of some AI-generated works from copyright protection.

  • Why is it important to continue discussions and research on AI and intellectual property?

    -It is important to continue these discussions to adapt to the changing landscape of creativity and technology. As AI becomes more integrated into various fields, clear legal guidelines and frameworks are necessary to protect the interests of all stakeholders and to foster innovation.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 AI Art Controversy: The Grand Prize Winner

The first paragraph discusses the contentious issue of AI-generated art winning a grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA. Jason Allen, the winner, used an AI tool called Midjourney to create over 900 images, from which he selected and refined three for submission. The controversy stems from the lack of guidelines regarding AI in art creation and the ethical questions it raises about the role of human creators. The narrative also touches on the broader implications of AI in creative fields, including the challenges of copyright and authorship, as well as the potential for AI to learn and mimic various artistic styles.

05:06

🤖 AI and Copyright: A Complex Legal Puzzle

The second paragraph delves into the complexities surrounding the copyright of AI creations. It highlights the differing perspectives of stakeholders, including producers who invest in AI technology and consumers who may be affected by potential copyright fees. The paragraph also mentions the National Intellectual Property Committee's recommendation to attribute copyright to those who contribute to AI creation and to revise laws to accommodate the use of big data. The summary acknowledges the rapid advancement of AI and the need for ongoing research and international benchmarking to address the evolving legal landscape of AI-generated content.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Artificial Intelligence refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think like humans and mimic their actions. In the context of the video, AI is used to create a piece of art that won a grand prize in a competition, sparking controversy over the role of AI in the arts.

💡Grand Prize

A grand prize is the top award given in a contest or competition. The video discusses how an artwork created with AI won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, which raised questions about the legitimacy of AI-generated art.

💡Midjourney

Midjourney is a term used to describe the AI tool that was employed to create the winning artwork. It represents the technology that can generate images based on textual prompts, which in this case, led to the creation of the award-winning piece.

💡Gigapixel

Gigapixel is an AI-enhanced image improvement tool mentioned in the video. It was used to enhance the resolution of the AI-created artwork, contributing to its quality and ultimately its success in the competition.

💡Jason Allen

Jason Allen is the artist who submitted the AI-generated artwork to the competition. His actions and the subsequent recognition of his work raise questions about the role of human input in the creation of AI art.

💡Copyright

Copyright is a legal right that grants the creator of an original work exclusive rights to its use and distribution. The video discusses the challenges of applying copyright law to AI-generated works, as current laws typically only recognize human creators.

💡AI Creations

AI creations refer to works generated by artificial intelligence without direct human intervention in the creative process. The video explores the debate over whether these creations should be considered art and if the individuals who use AI tools to generate them should be recognized as the authors.

💡Discord

Discord is an app mentioned in the video where users can sign up to use AI for creating images. It represents the platforms that facilitate the use of AI tools for creative purposes, which has implications for the art world and the attribution of authorship.

💡Midgenie

Midgenie is the AI tool that Jason Allen used to create hundreds of images, from which he selected the best ones for the competition. It exemplifies the use of AI in the creative process and the debate over the role of human curation in AI art.

💡Intellectual Property Committee

The Intellectual Property Committee is a group that discusses matters related to AI and intellectual property rights. The video highlights the committee's role in addressing the legal and ethical questions surrounding AI-generated content and its impact on the creative industry.

💡AI-Intellectual Property

AI-Intellectual Property refers to the legal considerations and rights associated with AI-generated works. The video discusses the committee's recommendation that humans or corporations contributing to AI creation should be attributed copyright, reflecting the ongoing debate on how to treat AI creations under the law.

Highlights

AI artwork won the grand prize at an art competition in Colorado, USA, causing controversy in the art world.

The competition did not reverse the award due to the lack of guidelines regarding AI-created works.

Jason Allen, the winner, used an AI called Midjourney to create over 900 images and selected three for submission.

Allen utilized an AI tool named 'Gigapixel' to enhance the image quality, resulting in an 11-dollar prize.

Many artists expressed anger over the use of AI in the competition, questioning the authenticity of human creativity.

The process of creating AI art involves using a command prompt to generate images based on text descriptions.

AI can create images in various styles, leading to debates over whether AI should be considered a creative tool or an artist.

Allen's role in the creation process included curating and refining AI-generated images to select the best ones.

The copyright status of AI-generated works is currently unclear under existing laws, which only recognize human-made works.

Kakao Brain's attempt to publish an AI-written poetry collection faced copyright registration issues.

AI creations are increasingly present in our daily lives, yet there is no legal framework for their copyright.

The National Intellectual Property Committee is discussing the future of AI and intellectual property rights with various ministries.

There is a debate over who should hold the copyright for AI creations and the extent of protection they should receive.

The committee recommended attributing copyright to humans or corporations involved in AI creation and revising the law accordingly.

The current technology level may allow for a weaker copyright for AI creations, but future advancements could change this perspective.

The National Intellectual Property Committee is continuing research and monitoring the situation as AI technology evolves.

The case of AI in art competitions has been ongoing for six years, indicating a decision on AI and copyright may be approaching.