Dezgo Vs Runway. Image AI Generators. Image to Image. Text to image.
TLDRIn this video, the host compares two AI image generators, Dezgo and Runway, focusing on their image-to-image capabilities. Dezgo is free but lacks precision and fails to meet expectations, often misunderstanding prompts like 'human neck' and 'pneumocystis jirovecii'. Runway, though not free, delivers better quality images, even if not perfect. The host tries different engine versions but finds Dezgo consistently disappointing, recommending Runway for its superior results despite the cost.
Takeaways
- 🆓 Dezgo is a free AI image generator.
- ⚔️ The video compares Dezgo with Runway's image-to-image function.
- 🤔 Image-to-image generators are often not of high quality, so the comparison aims to see how precise they are.
- 📸 Dezgo allows uploading a sample image and giving a prompt for image generation.
- 💸 Runway is not free, which adds interest to the comparison.
- 😐 The initial results from Dezgo and Runway were not satisfactory, with issues in understanding the human form.
- 🔄 Different types of prompts were tried, but neither generator produced desired results initially.
- 🧐 A prompt for an anatomically correct human neck was given to both generators.
- 🚫 Dezgo failed to produce any meaningful results, while Runway performed better but still had inaccuracies.
- 🔧 Different engines within the generators were tested, such as Stable Diffusion and Epic Diffusion.
- 🦠 A third task involving generating an image of pneumaticity or a microbe was attempted.
- 🔬 The comparison showed that Runway was more precise and scientific in its image generation.
- 🫁 A final task of generating human lungs was given, with Runway providing a better result than Dezgo.
- 🚫 Dezgo was deemed ineffective and not recommended for precise image generation.
- 👍 The video encourages viewers to like, subscribe, and support the channel for more content.
Q & A
What is the purpose of the video comparing Dezgo and Runway image generators?
-The purpose of the video is to compare the image generation capabilities of Dezgo and Runway, focusing on their ability to handle image to image tasks and the quality of their output.
Is Dezgo's image generator free to use?
-Yes, Dezgo's image generator is mentioned as being free to use in the video.
What is the main criticism of Dezgo's image generator in the video?
-The main criticism of Dezgo's image generator is that it fails to understand the concept of human self and produces low-quality, imprecise images.
How does the video describe Runway's image generator in comparison to Dezgo's?
-The video describes Runway's image generator as being more precise and of higher quality than Dezgo's, despite not being free.
What specific task was given to both image generators to test their capabilities?
-One of the specific tasks given to both image generators was to create an image of a human neck, anatomically correct.
What was the outcome of the human neck image generation task according to the video?
-The outcome was that Dezgo failed to produce a satisfactory image, while Runway provided a much better and more anatomically correct representation of a human neck.
What is the significance of the different types of engines mentioned in the video?
-The different types of engines, such as epic diffusion, stable diffusion, and simply Fusion 2.1, represent the various algorithms or models used by the image generators to create images, which can affect the quality and accuracy of the results.
What does the video suggest about the importance of the engine type in image generation?
-The video suggests that the type of engine used by an image generator can be significant, as it can lead to noticeable differences in the quality and accuracy of the generated images.
What is the final verdict on Dezgo's image generator according to the video?
-The final verdict on Dezgo's image generator is that it is not recommended due to its inability to produce precise and high-quality images.
What advice does the video give to viewers regarding the use of Runway's image generator?
-The video advises that while Runway's image generator is not free and still needs improvement, it is much better than Dezgo's and can be used to create several images for free.
Outlines
🤖 AI Image Generator Comparison
The speaker introduces a comparison between Tesco, an AI image generator, and two other image generators: Runway and Image to Image. They discuss the scarcity of high-quality free image to image generators and the importance of precision in their results. The video begins with a demonstration of uploading a sample image and providing a prompt to Tesco, which is free to use. The speaker also mentions that Runway is not free, and they are curious to see how it performs compared to Tesco. The results from both generators are shown, with the speaker expressing dissatisfaction with Tesco's inability to understand the concept of a human self and preferring Runway's output despite some issues.
🔍 Exploring Image Generators' Precision
The video continues with the speaker trying different versions of Tesco's image generator, including stable diffusion and epic diffusion, but is consistently disappointed with the results. They note that regardless of the version, the images produced do not meet expectations. The speaker then compares the performance of Tesco with Runway, highlighting that Runway, despite not being perfect, provides better and more precise results. The comparison includes a task to generate an image of 'pneumaticities Giro SC,' a microbe, and the speaker finds Runway's output to be much more accurate and satisfactory than Tesco's.
👎 Disappointment with Tesco's Image Generator
In the final paragraph, the speaker concludes their evaluation of Tesco's image generator with a negative verdict, stating that it is 'zero' to them due to its inability to produce satisfactory images. They also comment on Runway, acknowledging that while it is not free and has room for improvement, it still outperforms Tesco. The speaker wraps up the video by thanking the viewers for their interest, encouraging them to like the video and subscribe to the channel if they enjoyed the content.
Mindmap
Keywords
AI image generator
Image to image
Text to image
Desgo
Runway
Prompt
Anatomically correct
Stable diffusion
Microbe
Precision
Highlights
Tesco is a free AI image generator compared to Runway's paid service.
The comparison focuses on image to image generators, which are often of lower quality compared to text to image generators.
Uploading a sample image to test the generators.
Prompting the AI with 'new clothes' for the image transformation.
Disappointment with Tesco's inability to understand the concept of a human self.
Runway's performance is also criticized for losing details like 'nucleus' and 'new clothes'.
Testing different types of prompts and generators within the platforms.
Anatomical accuracy is attempted with prompts like 'human neck anatomically correct'.
Tesco's output is described as 'literally nothing' when precision is needed.
Runway is favored for providing better and more precise results.
Different engine types like 'stable diffusion' and 'epic diffusion' are tested.
Tesco's performance is consistently poor across different versions of stable diffusion.
A third task involving the generation of a microbe named 'pneumaticities Giro SC' is attempted.
Runway's results are deemed much better and more precise than Tesco's.
The importance of choosing the right engine type is highlighted with 'stable diffusion 1.1'.
Tesco is criticized for being free but useless, while Runway, despite its cost, offers better quality.
The video concludes with a recommendation against Tesco and a positive note on Runway's capabilities.
A call to action for likes, subscriptions, and engagement with the channel.