The FREE Plagiarism Detector Your University Hates! (I Tested 5)
TLDRIn this video, the presenter evaluates the top five plagiarism detectors, including Dupli Checker, PlagiarismDetector.net, Search Engine Reports, On.com, and PaperPal. They test these tools on both original and plagiarized content, comparing their effectiveness in detecting academic and online plagiarism. The results show that PaperPal, designed for academic use, performs exceptionally well, with a high word limit and alignment with university detection systems like Turnitin. The video concludes with a recommendation of PaperPal for its comprehensive features and suitability for academic needs.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The video compares five plagiarism detectors: Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Searchengine Reports, On.com, and Paper Pal.
- 🎓 The test includes checking for academic plagiarism and plagiarism found online.
- 📝 An original, unpublished paper was used to test if it would be falsely flagged for plagiarism.
- 💯 Dupli Checker and Plagiarism Detector both showed 0% plagiarism for the original paper.
- 🔍 Searchengine Reports showed 0% plagiarism, indicating it might be suitable for academic use despite being for SEO.
- 📊 On.com's Plagiarism Checker detected a 4.88% plagiarism rate, suggesting it found some minor similarities.
- 📚 Paper Pal showed a 26-32% similarity rate and provided a detailed report including sources of potential plagiarism.
- 📈 In a meta test using a plagiarism article, Paper Pal detected 96-100% plagiarism, outperforming others.
- 🌐 For website plagiarism, Dupli Checker and Searchengine Reports showed high plagiarism rates, while Paper Pal indicated 97-100%.
- 🏫 Paper Pal is recommended for academic use due to its large word limit, similarity to Turnitin used by universities, and detailed reporting.
Q & A
What was the purpose of the video?
-The purpose of the video was to test and identify the best plagiarism detector among five different tools, considering both academic and online plagiarism.
Which five plagiarism detectors were tested in the video?
-The five plagiarism detectors tested were Dupli Checker, PlagiarismDetector.net, Search Engine Reports' Plagiarism Checker, On.com's Plagiarism Checker, and PaperPal.
How did the video ensure that an original piece of work wasn't flagged for plagiarism?
-The video used an unpublished, original review paper from the creator's PhD work to test if these plagiarism detectors would incorrectly flag it as plagiarized.
What was the result for the original text using Dupli Checker?
-Dupli Checker showed 0% plagiarism for the original text, indicating no plagiarism was detected.
What was the outcome when the original text was checked with PlagiarismDetector.net?
-PlagiarismDetector.net also showed 0% plagiarism for the original text, suggesting it was correctly identified as non-plagiarized content.
How did Search Engine Reports' Plagiarism Checker perform with the original text?
-Search Engine Reports' Plagiarism Checker indicated 0% plagiarism, correctly identifying the originality of the text.
What was the result when the original text was checked with On.com's Plagiarism Checker?
-On.com's Plagiarism Checker found a 4% similarity, which after calculation was determined to be 4.88% plagiarism, suggesting it detected some minor similarities.
How did PaperPal perform in detecting plagiarism in the original text?
-PaperPal showed a similarity range of 26 to 32%, indicating a potential for plagiarism, but also provided a detailed report with sources of the detected similarities.
What additional test was conducted to evaluate the detectors' ability to identify academic plagiarism?
-The video creator used an introduction from a paper about plagiarism to test if the detectors could identify plagiarism within a plagiarized academic text.
Which plagiarism detector was recommended at the end of the video, and why?
-PaperPal was recommended because it has a high word limit of 7,000 words per check, is designed for academic use, and uses Turnitin, which is similar to what universities use for plagiarism detection.
Outlines
🔍 Comprehensive Plagiarism Checker Review
The speaker conducted a thorough review of five plagiarism detection tools, focusing on both academic and online plagiarism. The tools tested include Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Searchengine Reports.net, On.com, and Paper Pal. To assess the tools' accuracy, the speaker used an original, unpublished paper from their PhD to ensure it wasn't falsely flagged. Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, and Searchengine Reports.net all indicated 0% plagiarism for the original text. On.com's Plagiarism Checker detected a 4.88% similarity, while Paper Pal showed a 26-32% similarity range. The speaker appreciates Paper Pal's detailed reporting and its alignment with academic standards, suggesting it as a potential top choice for academic plagiarism detection.
📊 Results and Recommendations for Plagiarism Detection
The speaker presents the results of their plagiarism detection test, which involved using an introduction from a plagiarism article to see if the tools could detect self-plagiarism. Dupli Checker reported 89% plagiarism, Plagiarism Detector 88%, Search Engine Reports 95%, On.com 63.63%, and Paper Pal an impressive 96-100%. The speaker suggests that for academic purposes, Paper Pal is the most suitable due to its high word limit, academic focus, and use of Turnitin, a service widely used by universities. The speaker also mentions a technique to bypass daily limits on some tools by using a VPN, although they question the legality and ethics of this approach. They conclude by recommending Paper Pal for its comprehensive features and alignment with university plagiarism detection standards.
Mindmap
Keywords
Plagiarism Detector
Dup Checker
Academic Plagiarism
Search Engine Reports
Turnitin
Original Text
DOI
Unique Percentage
Upgrade to Prime
Text Version
Highlights
The author tested the top five plagiarism detectors available online.
The detectors were evaluated for academic and online plagiarism.
Duply Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Searchengine Reports, On.com, and Paper Pal were the tools tested.
Original work was tested for false positives in plagiarism detection.
Dup Checker and Plagiarism Detector had a 1,000-word limit for free use.
Dup Checker found 0% plagiarism for the original text.
Plagiarism Detector also reported 0% plagiarism for the original text.
Search Engine Reports detected 0% plagiarism, indicating accuracy for SEO and academic work.
On.com's plagiarism Checker identified 4% similarity, suggesting a unique content score of 95.12%.
Paper Pal reported a 26 to 32% similarity, providing a detailed report with a Prime upgrade.
The author conducted a meta-test by checking plagiarism in an introduction from a plagiarism article.
Duply Checker detected 89% plagiarism in the meta-test.
Plagiarism Detector found 88% plagiarism in the meta-test.
Search Engine Reports' plagiarism Checker showed 95% plagiarism in the meta-test.
On.com's plagiarism Checker detected 63.63% plagiarism in the meta-test.
Paper Pal identified 96 to 100% plagiarism in the meta-test, highlighting its effectiveness for academic detection.
Paper Pal is recommended for its large word limit, academic focus, and similarity to Turnitin used by universities.
The author suggests using a VPN to bypass daily limits on some plagiarism detection tools.
On.com's text version feature allows users to iteratively check for plagiarism.