Redrawing More AI Art Because You Guys Liked the First One
TLDRThe video script details the artist's process of redrawing three AI-generated artworks, sharing their critique on AI art and its inconsistencies. The artist emphasizes the importance of originality and the human touch in art, while also discussing the potential for AI to assist in menial tasks. Each redraw involves significant changes to the original design, addressing logical issues and refining aesthetics. The artist also experiments with their own art style and techniques, aiming to improve and evolve their work. The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to engage with the content and support the artist's work.
Takeaways
- π¨ The artist is redrawing AI-generated artwork and sharing their thoughts on AI art, which received a positive response from the audience.
- βοΈ The artist plans to make a series out of redrawing AI art, aiming to help people identify the inconsistencies that are characteristic of AI art.
- π§ The artist will not simply copy the original AI pieces but will make changes to character designs to address logic problems and improve the original design.
- π‘ The artist emphasizes that their redrawing is for fun and not intended to steal anyone's characters inspired by AI pieces.
- π The first redraw identifies issues with the AI art, such as inconsistent hand and hairstyle depictions, and the artist's approach to redesigning these elements.
- π The success of the previous video on AI art has motivated the artist to continue the series, despite some negative comments from AI proponents.
- π₯οΈ The artist discusses the use of AI in other contexts, such as in video games and films, where it can be a useful tool without infringing on the art industry.
- π The artist's experimentation with their art style is evident in the different approaches to lineart, shading, and coloring in the redrawing process.
- π The artist uses various digital tools and techniques to refine their work, such as the G-Pen for lineart and different shading methods to achieve a painterly look.
- π« The artist strongly criticizes the use of generative AI to claim original artwork, advocating for the importance of human effort and creativity in art.
- β¨ The final piece involves a character with a witch hat, which the artist redesigns with a space theme, adding star pendants and a gradient to the character's hair.
Q & A
What was the reception to the first video where the artist redrew AI-generated artwork?
-The first video received an absolutely insane reception and became a Hit Tweet, which motivated the artist to continue the series.
Why does the artist choose to change some aspects of the character's design when redrawing AI-generated works?
-The artist changes some aspects of the character's design to address logic problems or to refine the original design where it could use improvement.
How does the artist approach the redrawing process for the AI-generated images?
-The artist does not make a total copy of the original pieces. They change poses and may also alter character designs to resolve inconsistencies or to refine the design.
What is the artist's stance on AI art and its impact on the art industry?
-The artist is critical of AI art, especially when it is used to steal or replicate human artwork without permission. They believe AI should be used as a tool for inspiration or to assist with menial tasks, rather than replacing human creativity.
How does the artist feel about the comments from people who support AI art in the context of the art industry?
-The artist finds most of the supportive comments for AI art to be from hypocrites, trolls, or people representing laziness. They are motivated to continue their series partly to spite those who support AI art in this manner.
What are some of the issues the artist identifies in AI-generated artwork that makes it easily identifiable?
-The artist points out inconsistencies such as odd hand placement, blending of clothing with body parts, and floating objects as some of the telltale signs of AI-generated art.
How does the artist's approach to redrawing AI art serve as a commentary on the value of original human artwork?
-The artist's redrawing process emphasizes the importance of original human creativity and the flaws in AI-generated art. It serves as a critique of AI art and a celebration of human artistic skill.
What is the artist's opinion on the use of AI in other industries such as science and medicine?
-The artist acknowledges that AI can be useful in other industries for running complex calculations or advancements in science and medicine, as long as it does not steal human art or replace human creativity.
Can you provide an example of how AI has been used in a non-artistic context that the artist approves of?
-The artist mentions the use of AI in the remake of Final Fantasy VII for characters' facial expressions, lip syncing, and camera positioning, and in the film Spiderman: Across the Spiderverse, as examples of acceptable uses of AI.
How does the artist's view on AI evolve over the course of the transcript?
-The artist's view on AI remains critical throughout the transcript, but they also explore the potential for AI as a tool for inspiration or to assist with time-consuming tasks in the art industry, as long as it does not commit art theft.
What is the artist's final message to the viewers regarding AI art and their own work?
-The artist encourages viewers to support original human artwork and to be critical of AI art that steals from artists. They also invite viewers to engage with their content and provide feedback on the redrawing series.
Outlines
π¨ AI Art Redraw Series Introduction
The speaker, an artist, introduces their series on redrawing AI-generated artwork. They recount the positive reception of their previous video, which critiqued AI art, and express their motivation to continue the series. The artist clarifies that their redraws are not direct copies but involve changes to character design to address logical inconsistencies or enhance refinement. They also address potential concerns about 'stealing' character designs, emphasizing the transformative and creative nature of their work. The video kicks off with a critique of an AI artwork's inconsistencies, particularly in the character's hand and hairstyle, before delving into the artist's own drawing process.
ποΈ Refining AI Art: Character Redraw and Style Experimentation
The artist discusses their approach to redrawing a second AI-generated character, focusing on simplifying and refining the original design. They mention the use of different digital tools for sketching and lineart, and share their thoughts on AI's role in other creative industries, such as gaming and film. The artist also reflects on the potential for AI to assist in art creation without infringing on artists' originality. The summary includes a detailed account of the artist's coloring process, shading techniques, and the thought process behind their design choices.
π AI in Film and Artistic Integrity
The artist expands on the use of AI in creative fields, specifically mentioning its application in the film 'Spiderman: Across the Spiderverse'. They differentiate between harmful generative AI and AI that is used with the consent of artists to assist in laborious tasks. The speaker emphasizes the importance of human effort in art and criticizes AI for its inability to innovate, likening it to a 'copying machine'. The artist then transitions back to their own work, describing their process of coloring and shading the second character, and experimenting with new techniques to evolve their style.
β¨ Final Redraw and Encouraging Original Artistry
The artist concludes the video with a redraw of a third AI-generated character, a girl with a witch hat. They discuss the process of creating a more straightforward design, incorporating elements like star pendants for a space-themed aesthetic. The artist reflects on the ethical considerations of using AI-generated images as inspiration, advocating for originality and condemning art theft. The summary details the artist's coloring and shading process, their use of various digital tools, and their final thoughts on the potential of the character in future creative projects.
Mindmap
Keywords
AI Art
Redrawing
Design Refinement
Logic Problems
Character Design
Art Reception
AI Misreading
Art Theft
Shading Techniques
Background Composition
Artistic Style
Highlights
The artist is redrawing AI-generated artwork and sharing their thoughts on AI art.
The first video on AI art received an overwhelmingly positive response, motivating the artist to continue the series.
The artist will be redrawing three AI-generated pieces, making changes to character designs to address logic problems and refine the original concepts.
The artist emphasizes that their redraws are not meant to steal anyone's characters but are for fun and educational purposes.
Consistent issues in AI art, such as inconsistent hairstyles and floating objects, are pointed out as telltale signs of AI generation.
The artist's process involves sitting the character on a ledge and making several design changes including accessories and character posture.
The artist discusses the success of their last video on AI art and the mixed reactions it received, including criticism from AI proponents.
The artist advocates for traditional art creation, encouraging those who use AI to create art to learn and practice drawing instead.
The artist experiments with different art styles and techniques in their redraws, including using the regular G-Pen for lineart.
AI's role in the film industry is discussed, with examples of how it has been used in 'Final Fantasy VII' and 'Spiderman: Across the Spiderverse'.
The artist criticizes the misuse of AI in art as a replacement for human creativity and effort, while acknowledging its potential as a tool for inspiration or menial tasks.
The artist's approach to coloring and shading is detailed, including the use of multiply layers and add glow layers for highlights.
The artist's redesigned characters may be kept for future original works, with significant design changes from the AI-generated originals.
The artist humorously contemplates the idea of AI art generating more AI art, creating a feedback loop of imitation.
The final redraw features a character with a witch hat, with design choices influenced by space-related themes and personal artistic experimentation.
The artist concludes by encouraging viewers to support their work on social media and other platforms, and invites interaction in the comment section.